With April 23 marking the 400th anniversary of the death of William Shakespeare, few will remember that his lasting fame almost did not happen. A brilliant post by the New York Times explains how that came about.
Shakespeare was born in 1564 and died in 1616 on his 52nd birthday. A celebrated writer and actor who had performed for Queen Elizabeth and King James, he wrote approximately 39 plays and composed five long poems and 154 sonnets. However, by the time of his death, he had retired and was considered past his prime.
By the 1620s, his plays were no longer being performed in theaters. On the day he died, no one — not even Shakespeare himself — believed that his works would last, that he was a genius or that future generations would hail his writings.
He hadn’t even published his plays — during his lifetime they were considered ephemeral amusements, not serious literature. Half of them had never been published in any form and the rest had appeared only in unauthorized, pirated versions that corrupted his original language.
Two gold memorial rings
Enter John Heminges and Henry Condell, two of Shakespeare’s friends, fellow actors, and shareholders in the King’s Men theatrical company. In his will, he left them money to buy gold memorial rings to remember him. By about 1620, they conceived a better way to honor him — one that would make them the two most unsung heroes in the history of English literature. They would do what Shakespeare had never done for himself — publish a complete, definitive collection of his plays.
Heminges and Condell had up to six types of sources available to them: Shakespeare’s original, handwritten drafts; manuscript “prompt books” copied from the drafts; fragment “sides” used by the actors and containing only the lines for their individual parts; printed quartos — cheap paperbound booklets — that published unauthorized and often wildly inaccurate versions of half the plays; after-the-fact memorial reconstructions by actors who had performed in the plays and later repeated their lines to a scribe hired by Heminges and Condell; and the editors’ own personal memories.
Jaggard & Son
At the London print shop Jaggard & Son, workers set the type by hand, printed the sheets one by one and hung them on clotheslines for the ink to dry. The process was methodical and slow, done by hand. It took two years.
When at last the First Folio was finished, it was a physically impressive object. At more than 900 pages, it had size and heft. The tallest copies, right off the press, untrimmed by the printer’s plow, measured 13½ by 8¾ inches.
Published in London in 1623, “Mr. William Shakespeare’s Comedies, Histories & Tragedies” revolutionized the language, psychology, and culture of Western civilization. Without the First Folio, published seven years after the bard’s death, 18 iconic works — including “Macbeth,” “Measure for Measure,” “Julius Caesar,” “Antony and Cleopatra,” “Twelfth Night,” “The Winter’s Tale” and “The Tempest” — would have been lost and his evolution from poet to secular saint would never have happened.
The unpredictability of the future
The story of that book is an incredible tale of faith, friendship, loyalty and chance. Few people realize how close the world came, in the aftermath of Shakespeare’s death, to losing him.
Today, the First Folio is one of the most valuable books in the world. In October 2001, one of them sold for more than $6 million. Of the 750 copies printed, two-thirds of them have perished over the last 393 years. Two hundred thirty-five survive.
The unpredictability of the future is one of Shakespeare’s great, recurring themes. He would relish the drama of his own improbable tale. Time has performed many conjuring tricks, but few so fantastic as the making of the First Folio. Thanks to it, Shakespeare may have gone to his grave a mortal man destined to fade from memory, but today he is eternal.
Annika Perry said:
Wow! Thank you Nicholas for this informative and interesting post. I feel duly shamed and humbled as I had no idea of the history of Shakespeare’s fame nor that of the first folio. Absolutely fascinating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Glad to have made you feel… erm… shamed? *scratching head*
LikeLiked by 1 person
Annika Perry said:
I meant this is something I should have known!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Story Reading Ape said:
Reblogged this on Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog.
LikeLike
Mira Prabhu said:
Reblogged this on mira prabhu and commented:
Ephemeral amusements indeed!!!
On the day he (William Shakespeare) died, no one — not even Shakespeare himself — believed that his works would last, that he was a genius or that future generations would hail his writings.
He hadn’t even published his plays — during his lifetime they were considered ephemeral amusements, not serious literature. Half of them had never been published in any form and the rest had appeared only in unauthorized, pirated versions that corrupted his original language.
Go ahead and read Nicholas Rossis’s wonderful post…and thank you, Chris Graham, for leading me to it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Eve Messenger said:
Heminges and Condell were the Best. Friends. Ever. What they did was quite an undertaking. Thank goodness that had such faith in Bill’s work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Lol – I need some friends like that 😀
LikeLike
Mick Canning said:
I wonder what we actually have lost…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Hadn’t thought of that. Sigh…
LikeLiked by 1 person
TanGental said:
Lovely post Nick. It makes one ponder so many what ifs. Like had Einstein caught scarlet fever aged ten. Phew!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Oh, absolutely! I think that’s why people are so fascinated by the multiverse theory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Shakespeare Died a Nobody, then got Famous by Accident | Illuminite Caliginosus
Annette Rochelle Aben said:
Happy to learn more about Shakespeare. Must say, my life in high school would have been dreadful dull, had it not been for my Shakespeare class.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
You were one of those kids, weren’t you? Same here 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Barb Drummond said:
Reblogged this on texthistory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lbeth1950 said:
So glad they did this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Absolutely 🙂
LikeLike
floridaborne said:
Thanks for the history lesson.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
I hope it was more fun than the ones we got at school 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
floridaborne said:
A lot better than the snoozers from high school . 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
noelleg44 said:
Wonderful story I was completely unaware of – serendipity at its best, and so many thanks to Heminges and condel. What they did for the world is impossible to repay!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
I know, right? I wonder if even they realized the effect their decision would have…
LikeLike
Sheila M. Good, Author said:
Thanks for this post. I didn’t know this about his fame. Appreciate the lesson.
@sheilamgood at Cow Pasture Chronicles
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Hope it was more fun than the school history lessons 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sheila M. Good, Author said:
Absolutely!
LikeLiked by 1 person
cricketmuse said:
I learned a fair amount about the Bard at the Folger Library, but your post put it so succinctly. Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Wow, I’m flattered! Thank you 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
M.T. Bass said:
Reblogged this on Owl Works – The Scribblings of M.T. Bass.
LikeLiked by 1 person