Tags
A Short History of Christianity, Christianity, culture, culture wars, Evolution of the West, Spencer, Tomkins
Yes, I borrowed the title from the well-known Month Python sketch from Life of Brian.
Knowing my interest in religions and history, Electra got me The Evolution Of The West by Nick Spencer, based on a recent review by The Economist (from which I’m quoting below). A book that is doubly appropriate, as it examines the effect of Christianity on Western values, and argues that, to understand our present and shape our future, we really need to examine the past. And Christianity is a formative part of that past – surprisingly so for our secular times, when authors from Diderot to Richard Dawkins have raved about the triumph of secular man. What, after all, has Christianity ever done for us?
Rather a lot, argues Nick Spencer. Like a prophet crying in the post-modern wilderness, Mr Spencer provokes reflection that goes far beyond the shallow ding-dongs of the modern culture wars. Starting with the ancient world, he takes the reader on an extravagant journey to meet, among many others, Augustine of Hippo and John Locke as well as Thomas Piketty. The author believes that the fact that Christianity became the religion of the European establishment has blinded people to what a revolutionary doctrine it was (and is). And he clearly believes it can still play a role. The Christianisation of Europe, he says, was not a bunch of reactionary clerics trying to shut down a noble, free, secular ancient world, but a new idea of “a voluntary basis for human association in which people joined together through will and love rather than blood or shared material objectives”. Christianity declared that humans “have access to the deepest reality as individuals rather than merely as members of a group”.
Out of this, with a reinjection at the Reformation, came the origins of the modern world: a belief in equality of status as the proper basis for a legal system and the assertion of natural rights leading to individual liberty, as well as the notion that a society built on the assumption of moral equality should have a representative form of government.
Now, I may be a Christian, but I’m not an idiot. All churches have been responsible for deplorable actions (see below). Thankfully, the book is not a tragic lament for lost Christendom, and Spencer is frank about the sins of the church. But too often, he says, they blind people to the communal, psychological, educational and creative benefits that have flowed from Christian belief. And he worries about how the absence of deep cultural norms will play out in the West. Can secular creeds bind people together now that there is plenty of pluribus but not much unum?
Shorn of its establishment baggage, Spencer argues, Christianity still has much to say to an amnesiac world about human dignity, political freedom, and economic inequality. And, quoting William Wilberforce, he warns that Christian values are inseparable from Christianity itself. That is why the author argues that the end of religion is no nearer than Francis Fukuyama’s end of history. Lurking everywhere in the secularized West is what he calls a “disenchantment with disenchantment”. People still want more than just freedom and choice. They want to belong, they want a community rooted in something shared, they thirst for an identity, and they want to find meaning beyond themselves. “Having arrived at the secular self,” says Mr Spencer, “we kept on searching.”
All readers, whatever their religious, non-religious or political persuasions, should read this [book].
Sughra Ahmed, Chair, Islamic Society of Britain
Sins of the Church
If Mr. Spencer explains how Christianity is relevant today, Stephen Tomkins’ A Short History Of Christianity describes its chequered past, warts and all. Tomkins was a writer for the Monty Pythons, but also has strong credentials as a religious scholar. His presentation displays his dry wit, making the reading a—historically accurate—pleasure. Where else can you read about the time when the Catholic church, in a desperate attempt to clean up the Vatican elected a saint for Pope; a monk whose only aspiration was to be in a monastery cell and pray? The man resigned after a few months, because an angel was telling him to do so at nights, and nominated the cardinal this angel was urging him to make Pope. Sadly, it turned out this Cardinal had used some heating pipes that led to the Pope’s room to talk to the Pope at nights, impersonating an angel. As might be expected, the new Pope’s first act was to imprison his predecessor—who died in a prison cell a couple of years later.
And who nowadays remembers how the church selected a man who was an excellent manager by all accounts to clean up its affairs, shortly before the Reformation? A task he fulfilled admirably until he lay on his deathbed and made his dying wish: to make his 17-year-old son a Pope. Out of respect, the cardinals followed his wish, and the young lad did everything one might expect from someone his age who had grown up with a (now dead) overbearing, strict father: he opened up a brothel in the Vatican, castrated a bishop who dared criticize him, and generally did everything he could to undo his father’s work. His end was rather ignominious: he fled the Vatican when the people of Rome revolted against him, disgusted at his excesses, and died from a stroke in the arms of his mistress. He was still in his 20s.
What I particularly enjoyed about these books? That they offer an unblinkered, honest account of our past, helping us better understand our present. A present that Christianity has played a crucial part in shaping.
Hi Nick
Great historical review.
Also, try to check out “How The Catholic Church Built Western Civilization” by Thomas Woods and “What’s So Great About Christianity” by Dinesh D’Souza.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks! Amazon links, please. That way, people will find it easier to check them out 🙂
LikeLike
Here’s the link for “How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization”
And Dinesh D’Souza
LikeLiked by 2 people
Many thanks for sharing these, Ernesto!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Author_Iris_Chacon and commented:
Everyone needs to read Nicholas Rossis’ reviews of these two books. Mr. Rossis’ commentary is as thought-provoking as the volumes themselves. Thank you, Nicholas Rossis.
LikeLiked by 2 people
On people wanting to belong, that you refer to in your first review, Nicholas, there is at least one secular ‘church’ in the UK. I know little about it, but it seems to mimic the ‘real’ church in many ways.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for that. It’s an atheist church, actually, which I find fascinating 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting perspective. I believe that religion is great as a crutch to use in times of need, or a way to bring people together…not so much in its capacity to segregate people, or encourage discrimination.
LikeLiked by 2 people
How true. It can be divisive just as easily as it can be uniting. It’s really up to us.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree, there is much to admire in all the great religions and much good would happen if individuals followed their precepts. Indeed, I try, though I am a confirmed atheist. I can see that the ‘binding together’ can be an asset, but it is also the root of some of the problems – humans like to belong to an in-crowd, and to do this they instinctively identify an out-crowd.
LikeLiked by 2 people
How true. We have such a huge need for identity, and the easiest way to fill it is through an “us vs. them” mentality. It’s really sad when this way of thinking takes over religions supposed to unite people.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We owe a great deal to both the Moslems and Christianity for preserving and advancing math, philosophy and science from the Greeks. Catholic scholars embraced and preserved Plato, the Moslems, Aristotle. Scholars such as Roger Bacon introduced empirical thinking into Catholic philosophy, and others, such as Anselm, laid the foundations for modern philosophy. Moslem scholars advanced the field of mathematics, bridging the gap between classical and modern math.
Some of our civilization’s finest writers are monotheists, or were influenced by Christian, Jewish and Moslem thought.
We should never confuse Christianity with its advocates. Christianity, which was founded on tolerance, service and forgiveness mutated into the belief that truth was more important than people. [1] Jesus would have challenged that proposition and Mohammed, although also a warlord, would have most likely rejected it as well.
[1] It’s easy to think this shift occurred with Christianity’s rise to political power in the fourth century, but violence between Christians can be traced back earlier—at least partially to the rise of official offices within the local churches. Politics has as much to do with violence as the misunderstanding of faith.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I love how you remind us of the role politics played in all of this. Even the Roman emperors’ prosecution of Christians was mostly based on politics, not religion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Wind Eggs and commented:
We owe a great deal to both the Moslems and Christianity for preserving and advancing math, philosophy and science from the Greeks. Catholic scholars embraced and preserved Plato, the Moslems, Aristotle. Scholars such as Roger Bacon introduced empirical thinking into Catholic philosophy, and others, such as Anselm, laid the foundations for modern philosophy. Moslem scholars advanced the field of mathematics, bridging the gap between classical and modern math.
Some of our civilization’s finest writers are monotheists, or were influenced by Christian, Jewish and Moslem thought.
We should never confuse Christianity with its advocates. Christianity, which was founded on tolerance, service and forgiveness mutated into the belief that truth was more important than people. Jesus would have challenged that proposition and Mohammed, although also a warlord, would have most likely rejected it as well.
LikeLiked by 3 people
This is really interesting There are parts of church history that are dark and sad, but I think It’s important to keep in mind that churches are made up of people, and there will be nonsense anywhere there are people.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I love Monty Python by the way, they are hilarious. It’s been a while since I’ve watched Life of Brian, I will have to rewatch it. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Ooh, thanks for the reminder. I’ve got the DVD somewhere. Time to unearth it 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
How true. Sad, but true 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like what you had to say about this subject..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks – and welcome 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person