Tags
Google+, Google’s answer to Facebook, announced a few days ago in a simple blog post that the company will be “sunsetting consumer Google+.”
Almost hidden within talk of Project Strobe (a sort of audit for third-party apps and data privacy) was this simple declaration:
We are shutting down Google+ for consumers.
The decision seems to be the result of two things: that the platform failed to capture users’ attention, with 90 percent of Google+ user sessions lasting less than five seconds.
And second, a bug allowed apps access to people’s private data. More specifically, apps also had access to Profile fields that were shared with the user, but not marked as public. These included name, email address, occupation, gender, and age but not any other data you may have posted or connected to Google+ or any other service, like Google+ posts, messages, Google account data, phone numbers or G Suite content.
Even though the bug was patched in March 2018, and no one outside of Google seems to have noticed it, in the GDPR era this was the straw that broke the came’s back. Simply put, Google+ seems to be more trouble to the company than it’s worth.
Google+ will be gradually phased out in a period of 10 months.
Facebook Woes
The decision may also have to do with Facebook’s recent European woes. As the Economist reports, on September 28th, Facebook announced that an attack on its systems had exposed the personal information of 50m users—the biggest data breach in the firm’s 14-year history.
Unlike similar attacks that had occurred in the past, the company was forced to notify European regulators of the breach in order to comply with the GDPR. Regulators will have to decide whether Facebook did this within 72 hours of an attack being discovered, as the law demands. If it did not, it faces the threat of a penalty of 2% of annual revenue, or $813m. The fine could be even bigger—up to 4% of revenue—if officials find that the firm had not done enough to avoid the breach.
Facebook had already started to feel the force of the GDPR, which went into effect in May. Last month Vera Jourova, the European Union’s commissioner for justice and consumers, warned that it needed to amend its “misleading” terms of service to make clearer how it uses personal data—or face sanctions. And Max Schrems, a privacy activist who has successfully challenged the firm in court before, has lodged complaints alleging that Facebook forces users to consent to their data being processed, which the GDPR does not allow.
Inrupt
What may replace Google+? On September 30th Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, announced a new startup, Inrupt, which lets users store their information in personal “data pods” and control who has access to them. It could, he hopes, restore the balance of power between firms that process personal data and the people who provide them.
It remains to be seen whether this new platform has any hope of replacing the fallen giant.
Simon said:
Google + isn’t a great loss which is a shame, it could have been great. Facebook… oh dear Facebook. Why do I fear it’s time may soon be coming?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
It’s certainly been a bad year for Facebook, hasn’t it?
LikeLike
Simon said:
It has, but they had it coming really.
LikeLiked by 2 people
louis11725 said:
I will be honest, I did not notice much of a difference between regular Google and Google+, yet I thought Google+ was ok, no issues with it here. I wonder what the changes will be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
louis11725 said:
Oh, I did like the features of google+ where a person can set up a series of communities and collections.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
You mean Circles? That was the most popular G+ feature for a while–and the one hyped the most. Didn’t seem to make much of a difference in the end, though…
LikeLiked by 2 people
louis11725 said:
Hi, That too! I did notice that there were many in my circle rarely made any posts. But that is something that is all over the place, except facebook. I think if Google developed google+ better, it could have been much better. I am losing interest in Facebook with all the psycho babble and nonsensical posts and am actually enjoying WordPress more and more. People like yourself are making some really good posts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
That’s so kind of you; thank you 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
louis11725 said:
You are welcome
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Just to clarify, Google+ was the Facebook equivalent of Google. When you opened a Google account (usually by opening a Gmail one), you got a complimentary Google+ page as well. That’s the part of the company which will now be discontinued–and it has nothing to do with the usual Google search most people use. Most people probably never even realized they had a Google+ page!
LikeLiked by 1 person
louis11725 said:
So basically I will be losing my google+page then?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Yep. In about 10 months’ time
LikeLiked by 1 person
louis11725 said:
Interesting. I just inquired, via contact form, regarding this issue. I do like it much and have enjoyed it for quite some time. I will keep you posted if they return my message.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
That’d be great; thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Charles Yallowitz said:
I remember the fervor and smugness about Google + early on. That died fairly quickly, so I don’t think this is going to change the social media landscape that much. Now, if Facebook went down, that would be interesting. Part of me wonders what, if anything, would rise from the ashes. Mega-Twitter?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Now, that’s a scary thought 😀
LikeLike
Charles Yallowitz said:
As if Twitter could get any more disturbing. It’s amazing how a platform that is so limited (character restrictions) wields such power. Guess it feeds the modern human’s short attention span. Facebook fuels the pride in a way. Those likes are psychological candy. Guess Google+ forgot to appeal to a specific vise.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
You’re in a philosophical mood, aren’t you? 😀
I use FB to get my daily dose of funnies. It’s pretty good or that!
LikeLike
Charles Yallowitz said:
I got more sleep than usual. I should use FB to get more funnies too. All I see are politics and friends’ kids. The latter can be funny at times.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
I get the politics, too, plus a lot of posts from author friends announcing deals and new releases. B the vast majority is funnies–the result of Following the right Pages, I guess 😀
LikeLike
Charles Yallowitz said:
Probably. I need to hunt down more funnies then. Many of the ones I do follow went political.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Just follow my Page. I mostly share puns. The worse they are, the better 😀
LikeLike
Charles Yallowitz said:
I do and that’s where I get most of my funnies from. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Story Reading Ape said:
Reblogged this on Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Staci Troilo said:
Had not heard about Inrupt. Thanks for the info.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
It remains to be seen what (if any) success it’ll have 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
colonialist said:
Small print announcement on Google:
We are sunsetting google as at the end of the month to make way for an exciting new concept:
Local Libraries.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Lol–wouldn’t mind seeing *that* in their post 😀
LikeLike
Adele Marie said:
I downloaded the information on Inrupt but so far can’t understand it, I will persevere as I believe we need this new service to kick the butts of Google, Amazon and FB.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
I’m not worried. Sooner or later, there’s a new kid taking over the world… for a few years.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Adele Marie said:
you’re right there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Morgan Hazelwood said:
I think they might have done better if Google+ had been an extension of GoogleReader, where you could add content without a website. Rather than killing gReader and starting G+.
After the end of Buzz and Reader and [insert Google Beta Here] Google had a lot of people lose faith that they’d actually keep any of these new programs going…
I cross-post to G+, and occasionally people even like a post, but I’m not active there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Now, that’s a great thought! I wish Google had thought of that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
rijanjks said:
Most interesting. I must confess that I never spent much time in Google+ so it won’t be a great loss to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Same here, to be honest. I mostly used it in an SEO capacity, to increase organic traffic for my clients.
LikeLiked by 1 person
kimwrtr said:
I didn’t use Google+ that much. I do have automatic posts from my blog, the same with Tumblr. I read Facebook the most. I love the animal videos, inspirational posts, etc. But the political attacks, I mean discussions, are rampant. I forwarded an inspirational post that turned into a political debate between some of my family members. Seems there is almost an equal split between parties. It wasn’t fun.
There’s much more for authors on Facebook with Events, Author pages, etc., live videos, helpful sites such as 20BooksTo50K and Mastering AMS, etc.
Twitter is okay for some things but I don’t use it as much as I used to.
I recently started an Instagram account but I don’t care for it. I don’t use my phone for social media, so it makes it harder to post on Instagram.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Wow, I could have written that! With the addition that I do share a lot of puns on my FB page 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
kimwrtr said:
Reblogged this on Kim's Author Support Blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Goodbye, Google+ — Nicholas C. Rossis | GeezWriter Blog
Bryan Fagan said:
It just didn’t work and that’s a shame. You would have thought Google would have taken its social network to new heights.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
They gave a fair shot–and then some. But Facebook was simply better. I now wonder if the same will be the case with Blogger, seeing how WordPress has really taken off.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Friday Roundup – 26th October | Stevie Turner
cagedunn said:
Reblogged this on Cage Dunn: Writer, Author, Teller-of-tall-tales and commented:
Biting the dust – it’s contagious!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Beatles and The Week in Review – Joan Hall
Jemima Pett said:
It’s interesting that I’ve not had any info on this from Google itself. I’ve taken Sally Cronin’s blog advice and ‘secured’ my Google+ activity, but I suppose any info from Google went to gmail, which is where I send anything that might spam me in future!
So we’ll still have a Google account and gmail, then, just not Google+ from your understanding.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Yep, that’s exactly right. Doesn’t sound like you’ll miss Google+ much, either 🙂
LikeLike
John Holton said:
I seem to recall that Google essentially gave everyone with a GMail account a Google+ account, whether or not they wanted it and would use it. Few if any will miss it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
That does seem to be the consensus… 🙂
LikeLike
Pingback: Author Inspiration and Last Week’s Writing Links – Staci Troilo
louis11725 said:
here are some recent links to Google plus
I think it is a shame. I liked its many features and have enjoyed some good groups.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/10/08/google-plus-going-away-consumers.aspx
https://blumint.co/stop-thinking-google-plus-dead
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Thanks for sharing, Louis!
LikeLiked by 1 person
louis11725 said:
You are welcome
LikeLiked by 1 person
theresaly520 said:
I guess I would look for Inrupt then. I truly loved Google+. I got connected with a variety of rewarding discussions there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
If only more people were like you… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Patty said:
Reblogged this on Campbells World.
LikeLiked by 1 person