Tags
I will continue this special feature on online privacy and cybersecurity I started with my post, The Fight Against Fake News, with a post on Chinese efforts to tame the Internet. This will, hopefully, demonstrate the extent governments will go to in order to control the flow of ideas. And it may even spark a story or two for the sci-fi authors among us. Sadly enough, it’s probably going to be in the dystopian genre.
The information here is taken from an extremely well-researched post on Insightful.
INFORMATION WARFARE
Sun Tzu, the Chinese general, military strategist, and philosopher who is credited as the author of the famous book ‘The Art of War’, states:
For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill. Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.
Both the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) are working overtime to make this ancient quote into reality. Specifically, they are working on a concept called ‘Three Warfare’. This includes – ‘Public Opinion Warfare’, ‘Legal Warfare’ and ‘Psychological Warfare’.
The CPC and PLA work on many fronts simultaneously and on a long-term basis, to tighten their grip on Chinese citizens and to spread disinformation internationally when appropriate. And they have conceived some very powerful and effective tools for that purpose.
Indeed, a Harvard study showed that the Chinese government fabricates as many as 488 million fake posts on Chinese social media annually.
A more recent study analyzed 50 million comments on Chinese news sites and found that one-sixth of them were fabricated.
Needless to say, the size and sophistication of China’s Internet management are unprecedented in world history.
Great Firewall of China
Every system big or small has its own firewall to safeguard itself from intrusion. China devised one for the whole country.
The “Great Firewall,” China’s digital censorship technology, summons up images of an impenetrable fortress. It sits on the side and looks for keywords.
The firewall blocks foreign news, search engines, and content that is objectionable like sex or religion and social media, creating a buffer against information that goes against the party line.
Chinese populace is annoyed by this crackdown and often joke about their own country. The phrases “strong nation” and “wall nation” share a phonetic pronunciation in Chinese (qiangguo), some began using the phrase “wall nation” to refer to China.
While very effective, the Firewall is not an offensive weapon. People were able to dodge the firewall using VPN technology. So the agenda of the Great Firewall was further expanded by the Great Cannon.
The Great Cannon
The Great Cannon is slightly different from the Great Firewall. It acts as Man-in-the-middle (MITM). It intercepts traffic en route, changes the content or redirects it to fake information.
MITM injects and fires off code along with the content to the user seeking information. This code is capable of changing the content, block any subsequent traffic to the site or just clog up the website so as to deny the information requested. Whoever designed the Great Cannon created a deliberately offensive tool, designed to selectively replace benign web content with a malicious one.
Figure courtesy Citizenlab Canada
Golden Shield
The Great Firewall and Great Cannon can restrict and deny information but do not keep track of the users.
Tracking users is achieved by the ‘Golden Shield’. It’s a gigantic national database encompassing surveillance, speech and facial recognition, closed-circuit television, smart cards, credit cards, and internet surveillance technologies.
All these three manage information that enters and leaves China.
Chinese Propaganda Machine
“Making the Foreign Serve China” was one of Chairman Mao’s favored strategies, as epitomized by his decision to grant access in the 1930s to the American journalist Edgar Snow. The resulting book, ‘Red Star Over China’, was instrumental in winning western sympathy for the Communists, whom it depicted as progressive and anti-fascist.
YouTube is another tool being used by China to spread its views. A video released on August 1, 2018, for China’s Army Day, emotionally underscores the sacrifices made by service members of the PLA while showing off some of the country’s latest weaponry. At one point in the video, the narrator says “peace behind me, war in front of me,” which could be interpreted to mean that war is “inevitable.” This is probably as a warning to China’s regional competitors.
In India, the Chinese app Helo was found displaying false quotes or graphic images designed to provoke outrage along religious lines, manipulating the longstanding tensions between Hindus and Muslims in the country.
India has seen a rise in violent incidents caused by fake news, leading the Indian government to threaten to cancel the journalist’s accreditations if they are found guilty of writing fake news.
China has also been accused of inciting military personnel using WhatsApp and Telegram messaging Apps.
In parallel, a series of fake news campaigns have captured Taiwanese media, with experts tracing several of these stories back to China.
Various media outlets, including Chinese dissident media outlet Mingjing, referred to a leaked document from Chinese authorities affirming that Beijing had launched an information war, using disinformation, online harassment and trolling campaigns to manipulate public opinions in Taiwan.
China is planting such fake news not only using the internet but every means available at its disposal.
Radio, TV, and Print Media
China is deeply involved in the fourth-state businesses around the globe following top-down imprimatur from president Xi Jinping to “tell China’s story” to the world.
Within the last few weeks, China has leaped into the front ranks of global media by launching its ‘Voice of China’ super-network. With over 14,000 journalists and staff employees, this Asian blitzkrieg in the information war is deployed to neutralize American influence and spread disinformation on every continent.
China is also pushing to buy newspapers across the globe. Where it is not able to do so outright, it is taking the route of inserts. Cash-strapped newspapers are more than happy to help out China in spreading disinformation while helping themselves.
China has spent a whopping $6.8 billion on this disinformation exercise called da waixuan (大外宣), or ‘grand foreign propaganda’.
Figure Courtesy The Guardian
For more information on the subject, be sure to read the whole post on Insightful.
sara said:
Did you see in the news where India is now doing the same?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
No! That’s very interesting. Link, please?
LikeLike
sara said:
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Many thanks for that! The new arms race has already started–in cyberspace.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sara said:
that’s an amazing point of view, i hadn’t thought about it that way, but you are right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sandomina said:
Sara, I read the news article you referred to. There are a few points to be considered here. Unlike the western world where society is divided into 3-4 strata, Indian society has over 10 strata, some very modern and extremely intelligent to some having no clue beyond their daily meal. These lower layers are most vulnerable to fake news and hate posts, leading to rioting and communal clashes. So the intent of the government is to trace those who are perpetrators of those nefarious post, expose them and take appropriate legal action. Now someone wants to justify hateful content and loss of innocent lives, in the name of free speech, then you know their intent.
LikeLiked by 2 people
sara said:
I understand what you’re saying, but you seem to o think there is a bias and it’s either pro or against, which it is not. It’s just saying what the changes are and the concers about it.
Obviously, Indian society is much more of complicated. And there has been much more rioting in recent times in Europe and the States. No one is saying or justifying that, but how far should a government control it. That is the implied question for all of us not just India. Also, our media is much more commercially driven here which is also dangerous because everything is over sensationalized to sale more papers or news and it has an awful effect. Seriously, it’s why you see so many critize it. I’m not sure what stance you think this article is taking. But to me, it was implying the question to the reader, how comfortable are you with these companies and platforms that your using when you log on. Who should make the decision when you do? The company, the government or you, obviously it should start with the user.
Facebook may have a lot of people, but trust me fewer and fewer people use it here. For just that reason, and all the election stuff, my grandmother doesn’t even use Facebook anymore
LikeLiked by 1 person
kimwrtr said:
Reblogged this on Kim's Musings.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Charles Yallowitz said:
Wow. Really makes me think the world is going down a really dark path. At least humanity is.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Can’t be much worse than Windemere 😉
LikeLike
Charles Yallowitz said:
Windemere is paradise with magic everywhere. Nothing like Earth. 😜
LikeLiked by 1 person
Staci Troilo said:
I almost didn’t want to read this. More bad news. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
I have one last post concerning online data, then I’m done with this particular subject. I don’t want to lose my readers 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Staci Troilo said:
It’s valuable information. Even if it’s a sad commentary on our world today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
My new favorite saying is, “this, too, shall pass” 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Staci Troilo said:
I get it. I’ve been saying it for years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
C.E.Robinson said:
Nicholas, thanks, I think, for his horrible China news post! I knew some of this related to trade, but not the whole story. Hard to buy anything not Made in China! I’m trying my best! 📚🎶 Christine
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
In a sense, I’m happy to buy anything made in China. That way, they have as much as the rest of us to lose from pursuing an adversarial path!
LikeLiked by 1 person
C.E.Robinson said:
They’d get around it! Look at what they have done already! 😑
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
As I was telling Chuck, the Chinese seem more interested in controlling their own citizens and possessing a powerful deterrent to any outside force threatening the Communist Party’s interests than launching an offense against an adversary. Small favors, I know… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
C.E.Robinson said:
Thanks for bringing that up, Nicholas! Yep, I agree! 🤔
LikeLiked by 1 person
usfman said:
Any kind of war to me seems morally wrong. Thanks for sharing a global perspective on this topic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
I don’t subscribe to the pacifist point of view that any kind if war is morally wrong (the war against Nazi Germany being a good example of a “just war”) but I know what you mean 🙂
LikeLike
sara said:
I think though China has a military base in India
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
I haven’t heard of this. But I’m hardly an expert 🙂
LikeLike
shibumimc said:
LikeLiked by 1 person
shibumimc said:
Interested in Sun Tzu’s Art of War? Here’s what it is really all about:https://www.amazon.com/School-Sun-Tzu-Winning-Empires-ebook/dp/B079K3TDYR/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas C. Rossis said:
Thanks for the link, I was going to ask you for it. Bought it! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person