If you’re looking to enrich your fantasy or Medieval fiction, why not mention Cistercian numbers — the forgotten ciphers of Medieval monks? As Tibi Puiu reports on ZME Science, people have employed all sorts of systems throughout history, most of which are now forgotten. These include the intriguing Cistercian numbers used by monks in the Middle Ages, but also by Nazis and occultists in the 20th century.

Various Cistercian numbers from 1 to 9999 can be represented by superimposing up to 36 basic forms. Source: ZME Science
A Simple Logic
While Cistercian numbers may look odd at first, they are simple to use once you grasp the logic behind them. Numbers are represented by nine appendages to vertical stems that each correspond to units, tens, hundreds, and thousands.

Cistercian numbers are represented on a quadrant using horizontal and vertical staves. Source: ZME Science
Each of the four different orientations (1-9, 10-99, 100-999, 1000-9999) can be represented by changing the coordinates. So, practically, changing the coordinate of each ligature — either by rotating or mirroring them — can alter the digit from being a unit to a thousand. When the appendages are combined on a single stem, you get a cipher representing any number from 1 to 9999.
A 13th-Century Invention
This peculiar number-notation was invented in the late 13th century by Cistercian monks, near the border region between France and Belgium. For two centuries, the number system was used by monks belonging to the order across all of Europe as an alternative to the well-known Roman numerals and the ‘novel’ Hindu-Arabic numerals, the latter of which were just beginning to get adopted at the time.
The monks used this system to represent year-numbers in dates, and to number staves of music and pages of manuscripts. However, it also proved useful outside of the monasteries. We know the numerical notation was used in astronomy because Cistercian numerals were etched on astrolabes — a handheld medieval astronomical instrument — and used for astronomical tables compiled in Salamanca in the late 15th century.
The system eventually fell out of grace in favor of the much more flexible Hindu-Arabic numbering system, in part because Cistercian numbers are useful for representing only compact numbers up to 9999, as well as due to the fact that they were challenging to print. However, Cistercian ciphers would survive in use as secret codes. The Freemasons in Paris adopted it in 1780, and occultists and Nazis re-discovered the Cistercian numeral system in the early 20th century.
If you wish to have fun with Cistercian numbers, this website has a nifty online tool that converts Arabic numbers into them.
You lost me after ‘A simple logic’. Maths was never something I was good at.
And as for being logical… 🙂 🙂
Great tip though, Nicholas. (Is there a font for typing those though?)
Shared on Twitter.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Silly old ape gave you Ogham translation information, instead of Cistercian 😱
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not sure about that, Pete; there might be, but I don’t know of one. I think there are tools which allow you to design your own fonts, but unless it’s one you would be using frequently, probably not worth the time & learning curve; probably better just to make an image of the ones you’d want to use and just insert them at the appropriate size: at least the shapes are simple, being linear & straight. Cheers, Jon.
LikeLiked by 2 people
As I was just telling Pete, you can use the link at the end of the post to convert any number, then save the image. Easy peasy 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wasn’t serious, Jon. Just being a bit naughty. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I don’t know of any fonts but you can use the link at the end of the post to convert the number to an image, then download the image.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I was just being ‘cheeky’, Nicholas. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Shame! I’d love to own a font like that 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
My search for Ogham fonts threw up some sites where a limited selection of Ogham fonts can be downloaded free, but you might have fun with this site, which will ‘translate’ English to Ogham, Pete & Nicholas 😃
https://ogham.co/?q=
LikeLike
Thank you, Chris! Apologies for the spam filter acting up; no idea why it did that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s happened to me on quite a few blogs, Nicholas 😕
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog.
LikeLike
Fascinating! I was surprised to see separate sigils superimposed as one composite, but I suppose that doesn’t demand more familiarity than seeing a series which has to be parsed individually, like Roman numerals. I do like & respect accuracy though, when using arcane systems like this one. Cheers, Jon.
LikeLike
Well, I can’t say I understood it on a first quick reading, but perhaps it would become clearer with further study.
I don’t suppose the high numbers we need today would be needed so much in medieval times, so up to 9999 would suffice for most things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hadn’t thought of it but you’re right: 9999 would suffice for most applications!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very interesting stuff. I’m a bit of a geek/nerd when it comes to this stuff. I like to use things like this as clues in my mystery novels. I’m going to file this away, if you don’t mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mind? That’s what I hoped for – to inspire writers 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: *Press This* Medieval Cistercian Numbers #169 | Its good to be crazy Sometimes
Thanks, that’s my something new for the day!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Rebecca! Glad to have helped 😀
LikeLike