Author Anne R. Allen published yesterday a great post titled, 10 Dangerous Critiques: Beware Misguided Writing Advice. In it, she explains how trying to please everybody who beta-reads or critiques your WIP can turn a novel into a kind of jackalope of unrelated parts.
Sources of the Most Dangerous Critiques
1. The Realism Brigade
These are the folks who want to know when your characters go to the bathroom and point out that it really isn’t all that romantic to have your first kiss in front of everybody at work, the window of a department store, or the middle of a snowstorm. They’ll tell you that gun has too much of a kick for a young woman to handle or that nobody could run that fast in high heels.
The truth is that most fiction is not realistic and is not meant to be.
2. The Detailers
These are the folks who want you to tell us the species of trees that your heroine is running through to escape the giant sabertoothed cave rats. They’ll add, “And bring in all the senses here. What do the trees smell like? What does the pathway feel like under her feet? Are there birds in the forest? Describe their songs.”
By this time, the heroine has been eaten by the giant sabertoothed cave rats as we’re buried in irrelevant details. And your reader is bored to tears.
Details in fiction should be like Chekhov’s Gun. Only describe trees if your heroine is planning to beat said rats to death with them.
3. Grammar Enforcers
For my first Pearseus book, I paid good money to have my book proofread by an expert. Unfortunately, this was a grammar expert. Big mistake, as he had probably never read fiction in his life to judge by his comments. Most of his advice was unhelpful. Some comments were simply wrong.
These people may write nonfiction, or teach technical or business writing. Every one of their suggestions is correct, and they can tear through your WIP and make it read like a grammar textbook.
Not exactly what people read for entertainment.
Fiction requires sentence fragments, one-word paragraphs, and unfinished clauses. Sometimes you even need to use a preposition to end a sentence with.
If you let the Grammar Enforcers (or Grammarly, for that matter) get hold of your WIP, the result will send all your readers to sleep.
4. The Writing Rules Police
Closely related to the Grammar Enforcers are The Writing Rules Police. They can ruin any book with their strict adherence to a murky set of rules that may or may not have anything to do with good writing.
Several writers have destroyed a WIP by eliminating every example of the word “was” or purged it of every adverb or adjective.
Don’t let anybody ruin your book with silly rules. Some rules make sense to a point, and others are only helpful in certain situations and to solve particular problems.
But anybody who tries to follow all of the rules all of the time is going to end up with a mess.
5. Autobiography Sleuths
Have you ever had a reader assume a first-person narrator is the author? They seem to think every novel is an autobiography, so they try to ferret out the bits that give a revelation about you.
Allen says she once went to a workshop where several participants referred to her protagonist as “you.” One told her that her character should not wear orange, because it would look terrible with my coloring.
And at one critique group, a member walked out because her ditzy fashionista heroine made a snarky remark about people who wear Crocs. Apparently, Allen owns several pairs of Crocs, but this didn’t matter. That character was Allen, as far as that member was concerned, and she was permanently offended.
She also mentions a writer of YA fantasy — a tall man — who had a workshopper tell him his story would never work because he was too tall to hide in a wizard’s cupboard. Yup. Because the author is a 12-year-old elf.
The Autobiography Sleuths will try to make that elf into you if you let them. If somebody doesn’t “get” your genre or style, ignore their advice.
6. Dr. Phil Meets the Middle Ages
“There are more appropriate ways to establish boundaries,” one critiquer said of a writer’s lady-in-waiting character in her Tudor-era historical novel. The character had just pulled a knife on a particularly handsy duke. The advice was, “She should assert her rights and report his sexual harassment to the queen. Relationship problems should never be solved with violence.”
These are some of the most dangerous critiques. The suggestions may resonate with your modern sensibilities.
But don’t listen. Women in the Middle Ages (or a Fantasy version of them) did not have Feminist sensibilities. Neither did the men. Yes, their attitudes may be offensive to some people who live in very protected academic bubbles. But you need to ignore those people. They are not your audience.
Historical fiction doesn’t always have to be accurate down to the last rivet in a suit of armor, but the author does not want to let anybody put modern thoughts in a 500-year-old head.
7. The Morality Judges
The Morality Judges are related to the above group. Someone in a workshop will often complain that a character’s motivations are less than altruistic, so they find them “unlikeable.” Or they’ll tell you the character’s actions are wrong according to scripture and your book comes across as “Satanic.’
They are shocked and dismayed that your protagonist is planning to murder her abusive husband, when she should go to her pastor for counseling. After all, she made a vow to stay with him in sickness and in health.
These people provide a whole lot of “shoulds” in their advice. The main one is that all fictional characters must be perfect, upright citizens from page one. There should be no room for growth or a character arc.
You can imagine how boring their own conflict-free stories must be. The only “should” here is you should ignore all their advice.
8. The Soul-Crushers
Shortly after I started my Indie career, I argued on LinkedIn with someone who said no Indie work can possibly be good. She was so offended by my disagreement that she bought Pearseus: Schism and proceeded to leave 1-star reviews on every single Amazon site, from Japan to India, Mexico, and Australia! While I admired her dedication, her review made little sense. For example, she complained that she gave up reading once giants made their appearance. The thing is, none of my works feature any giants.
This is an extreme case of a soul-crusher but others can be just as bad. They perpetrate the most dangerous critiques of all. It isn’t always what they say, but the tone of voice and harsh delivery. They’ll start a critique with an exaggerated sigh, perhaps accompanied by a pitying half-smile.
They’ll tell you that your premise is ridiculous and you can never write a whole novel about an elf who has accidentally made himself invisible. Or they will deem your voice “puerile” and suggest you give up novels and learn to write haiku.
They also may deliver ad hominem criticism, calling you arrogant and stupid since you have no qualifications for writing on the subject of elves. They may tell everyone, at great length, how personally, they are much more qualified than the hapless writer, After all, they once worked as a department store elf at Christmas.
After you leave the workshop in tears, you must erase every word this person said from your memory. They have an agenda that has nothing to do with you or your work. Chocolate helps, as does the company of a good friend.
9. Genre Inappropriate Dogmatism
Turns out that being a “people pleaser” can be a real problem.
As Allen explains, she inadvertently turned a breezy rom-com into a Grey’s Anatomy episode after a man told her with great authority what a complicated procedure a tummy tuck is. So, she added way too much clinical detail to her novel. Reviewers were not impressed by the added realism.
From this, she learned that you should never let one person’s opinion change your WIP, especially if they don’t know your genre. This is not just because of the Dunning Kruger effect, whereby the most confident people are often the most ignorant on the subject. It is because even the most well-meaning beta readers can give you poor advice when they are not part of your target audience. They don’t do it because they want to ruin your WIP. It’s just that some people have a set of rules in their heads they think apply to all genres.
So, keep in mind that your quiet literary domestic novel can be ruined by thriller writers who tell you a novel must have, “more action! Get those people to move. They’re just sitting around talking! Nobody’s going to read that.”
The reverse is true when people trained in literary workshops want to know the psychological motivations of every member of the gang trying to whack our hero. And of course, they want the hero to be more introspective. “What’s his backstory? Does he have parents? Siblings? Why doesn’t he think about them when he’s chasing the bad guys in the stolen police cruiser?”
We all have to remember that specific genres have specific rules that don’t apply to other genres. Don’t let some mystery writer get you to throw a dead body or two into your sweet Romance, or move some terrorists in next door.
Yes, it’s a story, not an essay or expose.
And no one’s opinion counts more than the author opinion, as they know what emotional context the words create.
I once gave up on a book I’d finished thanks to a nasty critiquer – just couldn’t face it knowing he’d read and rubbished almost every word.
LikeLiked by 5 people
I’m so sorry to hear that, Cage! Perhaps you can revisit it in the future?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry to hear. A break is sometimes needed after that. Critiques can be harsh but they should always offer some positives. If not, then safe to say this person’s opinion is to be ignored. I hope you return to it Cage. Don’t let anyone crush your writing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I dropped out of the group after calling him out on it twice. That’s enough, I think, to indicate the nature of a person. The writing always continues, but that particular story is scarred.
When it comes to critique, I welcome even harsh comments, as long as it relates to the story, and comes from the place of wanting to help make the story better, stronger, empowered. We need each other for that, but not to be personally flayed.
Sorry, I’ll go sit in a corner with my ice-cream after that little rant …
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ll bring my salted caramel cone and sit by you, if you don’t mind 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re very welcome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So sorry to hear. Critique group should be about helping each other, if critism is given it should be constructive. Hope the ice cream helped!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Icecream always helps.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, definitely! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
thank you for your concern and empathy. I appreciate it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is such a shame – you clearly thought alot of the book to have taken the critique so much to heart…why not let someone else face it?- give it to someone and ask for all the positive side not critique and what they liked about it…then look at it from what was found great in it! You may find some of the nasty critiquer had some good points (or he/she was just full of hot air) then give to a few more for some mixed comments and then change on parts that the people do not say are their favourite sections and use that to try and boost good sections to great sections. Find someone who can change your perspective on how you feel about the book… dont give up but do it only when you feel ready – hearing what people really liked in it can be a big help too as then you may find sections you want the reader to like more and work on those.
LikeLiked by 3 people
All good points, Eli, but a mean-spirited critic can break your spirit – especially in the early days, when you don’t believe in yourself. I lost some 25 years because of that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When it comes to critique, I can take the hard knocks/comments that relate to the story, but when it’s personal pounding [are you writing about yourself, he sneers] it detracts from any sense of moving the story forward.
There will be many stories I start and don’t finish, and that story will be one of them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m so glad you enjoyed it as much as I did!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on theshammuramat and commented:
Excellent advice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is wonderful. I particularly liked the grammar advice and the comments about writing rules. I tried to eliminate every ‘was’ from the novel I’m writing but found the task impossible. Ditto adverbs and adjectives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Most of us have been down this particular rabbit hole and it’s just not worth it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are absolutely right. 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Kim's Musings and commented:
Sound advice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great advice all round. When I started to write fiction on my blog, I gathered up all of those writing ‘rules’. Then I put them into a metaphorical suitcase, and threw it out of the window. Freedom!
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nice one, Pete! I have a suitcase of my own 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have a city, in one of my fantasy books, that is on the border with the next country. For defence it is built in a loop of the river with walls all round. It has only one gate facing it’s own country.
One critiquer gave me a detailed account as to why, strategically, it would not work. And I mean detailed! I had based this idea on a real-life city, Cahors, in France, although Cahors did have gates onto the river, but it isn’t a border town.
I ignored his suggestions, apart from the fact that the city had already appeared in an earlier book and I could hardly change it drastically.
I think this critiquer had forgotten this is a fantasy book, not a treatise on strategy.
I have a battle later in the book. I wonder what he’ll do with that? Especially with magic involved. 😃😏
LikeLiked by 1 person
Magic?! What are you trying to do, kill the poor critiquer ? 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha! He did it with the best of intentions, I suppose, and very knowledgeable and practical.
I don’t really want to kill him, but perhaps some kind of mind-altering spell might have done the trick about convincing him of too much realism.😃
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Corabia cu gânduri a Marinei Costa – Marina Costa s shipload of thoughts and commented:
Been there, listened to the wrong people, never doing it again… Worth knowing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
An excellent post. I think I have run the gamut with most all of these. The bottom line, is write your story like it needs to be told and let the editors work out the details. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I love your bottom line, Jan! Well said!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s really important to tell beta readers exactly what you expect from them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
True. It’s equally important to pick the right people for the job.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is good advice, Nicholas. I only found a lovely Beta Reader recently and he writes fiction himself so he knows how it works. I’ve been quite lucky with my writing career to date and had excellent feedback and developmental editing from the people I’ve worked with.
LikeLiked by 3 people
That’s wonderful, Robbie! Treasure your Beta 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol yup. I’m a firm believer of there being no ‘one advice to rule them all’. Even Stephen King uses adverbs. Anyway, thanks for this post, Nicholas!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know, right?? King uses adverbs all the time but people think all it takes to write like him is to avoid them like the plague. Sigh…
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Claire Plaisted – Multi-Genre Author and commented:
Brilliant Advice … Enjoy the read.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Nicholas, writing advice is great but at the end of the day it’s the author’s decision whether to accept or decline! It can get muddling! Lol
LikeLiked by 3 people
That is so true, Marje! At the end of the day, it’s your story.
LikeLike
Absolutely Nicholas. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very safe advice. Half the writing journey is figuring out what works for your story and what doesn’t.
LikeLiked by 4 people
That is so true, Damyanti! Thank you 🙂
LikeLike
This was refreshing to read. I think the approach of writing and saying what you intend on saying first, is correct and necessary. Think about it, If it’s not your vision & message because it’s been hijacked by other factors… than what’s the point? Well said. Express yourself. Get what you have to say off of your chest.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree completely! Thank you for the comment 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sure thing ! Positive vibes and energy to you 😎
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you! To you too 🙂
LikeLike
Fantastic advice. I especially dislike the ‘realists’. I mean, Back to the Future is my favourite movie of all time but I’m pretty sure that Delorians can’t be converted to time machines. The same goes for my dystopian novel that’s set in 2133 where computer algorithms rule the world. It’s fictional! It makes complete sense because I am the author and I get to say how my world makes sense.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lol – yeah, “realists” can ruin everything 😀
LikeLike
Great advice! I’ve heard that it’s helpful to get beta readers who read your genre often. Writing rules should have a reason.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Couldn’t agree more!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Catching up. This is a great article. It is good to get feedback, but you should balance that by keeping in mind you can’t possibly please everyone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How true, Michelle!
LikeLike
I think some other bad advice, to be relevant here, is that they expect too much. Most of us are not going to write the next classic. In fact, many of us will never be published in a mainstream way. There are programs and computers that write 100,000 books a year and sell them on Amazon. We, however, are the knitters of the place with organic books like organic foods. Our products aren’t as pretty, don’t last as long, and we don’t have millions to advertise with nor are we celebrities who can have a machine or ghost writers do everything for them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I actually wrote about AI writing a while back and I use it in my job. It still has a long way to go before it can be anything as good as what writers create but you’re right – it’s crazy how things are evolving!
LikeLike